EU AI Act

Built the way the Act reads.

The EU AI Act’s high-risk obligations became enforceable on August 2, 2026: human oversight, logging, and AI disclosure. Our architecture maps onto those duties — and “maps onto” is the claim, chosen carefully. What it does not mean is stated plainly at the bottom of this page.

The mapping

Three duties, three mechanisms.

Article 14 — human oversight
The Act asks for effective human oversight of high-risk AI systems. Here oversight is not a review meeting: trust is graded per name from T0 to T4, earned on watched evidence, and three things stop at the human at every level — anything irreversible, anything that risks the company, anything over your spend tier. The escalation gate is human-only at the API and refuses roster calls, including a name escalating its own case.
Article 12 — record-keeping
The Act asks for logging adequate to trace a system’s operation. Here every action is attributed to the name that took it, every cent is metered to your ledger, and every trust change lands append-only with a written reason — including the changes that reduced oversight, which are exactly the ones a record exists for.
Article 50 — transparency
The Act asks that people know when they are dealing with AI. Here disclosure is not a setting: every name tells you it is AI — to you, to your customers, on its own staff record — and the site-wide disclosure line appears on every page at full contrast.

The limit

What this page does not claim.

Using Axioma Facere does not make your business compliant with the EU AI Act. Compliance attaches to your use: what you deploy the roster on, in what role, facing whom. No vendor can sell you that conclusion, and we will not pretend to.

What the architecture gives you is the shape the Act keeps asking for — oversight that is enforced, records that are append-only, disclosure that is structural. If your assessment needs those to exist, they exist here, and you can read exactly how on the governance page.

Direct answers

The questions EU operators ask.

Where is the record I would show an auditor or a regulator?

Your ledger, in your panel: every action attributed, every trust change with its written reason, every cent metered. Append-only is the property that matters — the record of a widening cannot be quietly edited after the fact.

Do my customers see the AI disclosure?

Yes. Disclosure is not configurable politeness here; every name states that it is AI in its external communications. If that costs an occasional sale, we have chosen the cost.

Is this page legal advice?

No. It maps our architecture onto the Act’s oversight, logging, and disclosure duties so your counsel has something concrete to assess. The assessment is theirs.

Read the constraints in full.

The governance page holds the four hard constraints and the trust ladder — the mechanisms this page mapped onto the Act.

Request an inviteThe governance model